The
Transnational Elite (TE)
―
mainly the elites based in the “G7” countries
―
just
discovered the
new
“cause
of evil” which threatens us all: the
Islamic state (IS),
formerly
ISIS.
Thus, the world’s most powerful elite
(financially, politically and militarily)
combines its incomparable
forces to confront not
another
superpower,
but
a few thousand
jihadists, who do not even have at their
disposal a regular army
and naval
or
air force
―
even though the air force is today decisive in
determining
the outcome
of wars,
as demonstrated by the Libyan example.
However, although national liberation ideals may
also inspire the jihadists, as they did Al
Qaida, in fact IS represents a vulgarized
version of it. Thus, while
in the latter the national liberation element
prevailed over the religious element, in
IS
exactly the opposite is true. That is why even
Al Qaida had to disavow ISIS.[1]
Nevertheless, it was precisely the mixed
nature
of
ISIS
that enabled it to temporarily reach significant
political power
in Iraq, as I wrote
in a previous article,[2]
attracting many of
those Iraqis (Ba’athists, or just Sunnis) who
were excluded
from power
by the
American
Occupation Authority and the protectorate it
installed with
the help of
Shiites, who constitute the
majority
of the population. However, it was hardly
surprising that the American occupiers who
created the conditions for the Shiites to
monopolise power in the non-Kurdish part of Iraq
would withdraw their blessing from Maliki, when
his Shiite government began collaborating,
directly
or
indirectly, with the
two regimes in the region that have been
targeted by the TE. That is, the Iranian and the
Syrian regimes, which are based on national
liberation movements and have been targeted for
this reason by the TE, for “regime change,” so
that the integration of the entire Middle East
into the New World Order (NWO) could be
completed.[3]
Thus, the Shiite government was given the
“choice” either to share power with the Sunnis
or to face alone the jihadists who were rushing
towards Bagdad. This way, the TE occupiers could
achieve a double objective:
-
first, to the extent that the sharing of
power between Sunnis and Shiites proves
successful, the
long-term TE goal
for
the
dismemberment
of Iraq could be achieved,
on the successful model
of Yugoslavia,
with a pro-Western
Kurdish
part in the
north and the TE-controlled
alliance
of the Shiites
with the Sunnis in the rest of Iraq.
-
second, the bombing campaign against IS,
“wherever it exists”
as Obama[4]
put it, opens the way for bombing Syria as
well, which the TE members explicitly
included in the targets to be hit, having
made clear in advance that this will be done
without asking first for Syria’s consent, or
a UNSC resolution, in blatant violation of
international law. All this, because the TE
have unilaterally decided that Assad is part
of the problem, not the solution!
However, the obvious question is raised why the
heretofore allies of the TE in slaughtering the
peoples of Libya and Syria are now prescribed to
have the same fate as their previous victims.
Setting aside the TE propaganda rhetoric about
saving the world from terrorism, which is as
true a reason for the present campaign as for
its previous campaigns which destroyed
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, the main
reason why the TE turned against its erstwhile
allies has to do with the fact that in the last
few months they showed clear signs of their
determination to become independent from the TE.
This was clearly shown first by their summer
campaign to put the TE-backed anti-Assad forces
(like the Free Syrian Army) to rout, which has
inevitably increased Assad’s power.[5]
Yet, the informal TE-ISIS alliance was based on
the understanding that they will fight Assad,
not the Western backed “rebels,” who were
groomed by the TE to take over once Assad was
out of the way! A further sign of autonomy by
ISIS, which actually sealed its fate, was their
recent attacks against the traditionally
pro-western Kurds of Barzani in Northern Iraq,
where also some of Iraq’s most important oil
wells happen to be located. So, the mass
propaganda by the TE-controlled world media was
set in full motion against the “pure evil
terrorists” who was shown every night on western
TV screens busy beheading western journalists
and others.
Therefore, as
it turns out
now, the target of this mass propaganda was not
just
to increase
the wave
of Islamophobia, as
a counterbalance to the
massive wave of
anti-Zionism
created
by the far bigger massacre
in Gaza, but also
to
prepare
the
ground for the new
campaign.
It was actually for exactly this reason that
the TE used the jihadists both in Libya and
Syria. The
wild
terror
unleashed
by ruthless
jihadists
against
the national liberation movements supporting the
regimes of both Gaddafi and Assad played a
decisive role in the overthrow
of Gaddafi and in dismantling much of Assad’s
regime.
Terrorism, along with
brutal
NATO bombings, achieved the
destruction
of these countries and their conversion into
“failed states,” even though regime change,
without NATO bombardment, has not yet been
achieved in Syria. In fact,
this conversion is only the preliminary stage
in the process of a country’s
full integration
into the NWO, even
if further TE action may be needed in the future
to complete the integration process, as already
requested by members of the TE like France.
However, this process is completely
misunderstood by the Palaeolithic Marxist Left,
which attempts to understand what is going on
today using the redundant tools of imperialism
and empires and with no clue whatsoever of the
immense significance of the emergence of a new
systemic phenomenon, the rise of transnational
corporations, which effectively run the NWO of
neoliberal globalization.[6]
Needless to add that as long as the jihadists
butchered Arabs, the philanthropists in the West
were not bothered at all by this. It was only
when Westerners began to be slaughtered on prime
time TV that a wave of indignation burst within
the ‘world community’ and a consensus was
formed, (according to opinion polls anyway)
which, incidentally, gave the signal to the TE
leaders to start the bombing
of Syria. A bombing which was only postponed
last year, following Russian’s intervention,
which forced Assad to accept the destruction of
his chemical weapons, saving also the TE from
having to do it itself later on!
The moral
of the story is that in the NWO terrorism is
prohibited, unless
directed
against the enemies of the TE and
its partners
(e.g. Syria). Similarly, fascism is not
prohibited, as long as it is used to support
the friends of the TE (e.g. the junta of Kiev
and its members in the “Right Sector” etc.)
P.S.
In an international
blog
specialising
in
anti-Semitism,
one
Dimitris
Kravvaris
undertook to
distort
(with
slanderous
allegations
which he had later
to remove)
the article
entitled “NATO and planned 'chaos' in the NOW” (Pravda.ru,
10/9/2014) to prove my…anti-Semitism. Of course,
I do not expect
loyalty
certificates,
particularly
from the “Holocaust
industry”
(Norman
Finkelstein).
*
A first version of this
article was first published in TF’s
weekly column in Sunday’s
Eleftherotypia (a Greek daily
published in Athens) on 14//9/2014.
This article has also
been published simultaneously by
Pravda.ru on 15/09/2014.
The translation into English was edited
by Jonathan Rutherford.
[3]
See Takis Fotopoulos,
Subjugating the Middle East (to be
published by Progressive Press later in
the year).
[5]
Deborah Haynes & Tom
Coghlan, “Nine towns fall as Syria
rebels flee to the arms of ISIS,” The
Times (08/07/2014).
The International Journal of
Inclusive Democracy, Vol. 10, Nos. 1/2
(Winter/Summer 2014);
Special Edition: A Collection of the 2014
Articles by Takis Fotopoulos;
The completion of
Iraq’s destruction by the Transnational Elite
and the role of ISIS (11.07.2014);
The new Transnational
Elite and Zionist massacres
(20.07.2014);
Obama and the Ideology
of Globalization (27.07.2014);
The Zionist
Brutalization Within the New World Order and the
Need for a United Multi-national and
Multicultural State (06.08.2014);
The imperative need for
popular fronts of national and social liberation
in the globalization era
(12.08.2014);
The
Russian embargo and the Ukrainian “coup from
below”
(18.08.2014);
The new “growth”
economy of the New World Order
(25.08.2014);
Russia, the Eurasian
Union and the Transnational Elite
(31.08.2014);
NATO and planned
"chaos" in the NWO (11.09.2014);
Syria Next and the
Islamist bogeyman (17.09.2014);
Scotland and the myth
of independence within the EU
(22.09.2014);
Transnational Terrorism
(29.09.2014);
BRICS and the myth of
the multipolar world (06.10.2014);
The real objectives of
the Transnational Elite in Syria
(13.10.2014);
Τhe
Transnational Elite and the NWO as
“conspiracies”
(20.10.2014);
Oil economic warfare
and self-reliance, (27.10.2014);
Towards a new
Democratic World Order (03.11.2014);
Democracy, the internet
and freedom of speech (14.11.2014);
Russia at the
crossroads (20.11.2014);
Globalization, Russia
and the Left (27.11.2014);
Economic warfare the
main Western weapon (06.12.2014);
The Myths about the New
World Order (15.12.2014).